Introduction to Mixed Integer Programming

Mixed-Integer programming are used to solve optimization problems with discrete decision variables. Hence, its feasible region is a set of disconnected integer points and gradient based algorithms cannot be directly applied. .

Motivation

Mixed-Integer programs (MIP) are used in several disciplines including:

MIP Introduction

MIPs consists of an objective for the problem and a set of constraints on its decision variables. Solving a MIP is based on the branch and bound linear programming’s algorithm.

Branch and Bound algorithm

Basic branch-and-bound steps are :

After branching a variable in the resulted sub-MIP, we then create a search tree and the nodes of the tree are the MIPs generated by the search procedure. The leaves of the search tree are the MIPs that are not yet branched. Once we get an optimal solution from any node in the search tree, we then designate it as a leaf node creating a space of feasible solution from all leaf nodes.

GAP

The optimization process consists of identifying the feasible space generated by solving the LP relaxation of the search tree nodes and narrow down the set of feasible solution based on the objective function.

During the search process at the leaf nodes, the node having the best objective function value is called the best bound. The difference between any node objective’s value and the best bound’s objective value is called the gap. We can demonstrate optimal solution by having gap with zero value.

Presolve

Before applying the branch-and-bound algorithm, usually the MIP solver would do a presolve step to reduce the problem. These reductions aim to reduce the size of the problem and to tighten the formulation for faster solving time. Presolve step in any MIP solver is a critical step that would reduce the LP feasible space search.

Ralph E Gomory introduced cutting planes to tighten the formulation by removing the undesired fractional solutions during the solution process.

Example using CVXPY

Now to the practical part, we will use a library called CVXPY that’s a wrapper on top of multiple solvers commercial and free, making it easier to switch between solvers.

Available Solvers for cvxpy

  LP QP SOCP SDP EXP MIP
CBC X         X
GLPK X          
GLPK_MI X         X
OSQP X X        
CPLEX X X X     X
ECOS X X X   X  
ECOS_BB X X X   X X
GUROBI X X X     X
MOSEK X X X X X X
CVXOPT X X X X    
SCS X X X X X  

Problem statement

In the upcoming example, we create a simple MIP quadratic problem where x is the optimization variable and A,B are problem parameters

\[\begin{split}\begin{array}{ll} \mbox{minimize} & \|Ax-b\|_2^2 \\ \mbox{subject to} & x \in \mathbf{Z}^n, \end{array}\end{split}\]

Code

We start by importing CVXPY and Numpy libraries.

import cvxpy as cp
import numpy as np

Now generating the random problem using Numpy

np.random.seed(0)
m, n= 40, 25

A = np.random.rand(m, n)
b = np.random.randn(m)

Then we create CVXPY decision variable with integer flag set to true (to denote it will have an integer value)

x = cp.Variable(n, integer=True)

Now we define our objective

objective = cp.Minimize(cp.sum_squares(A @ x - b))

After that we define the problem taking as input the following params:

prob = cp.Problem(objective)

solve function takes as input the following optional params

prob.solve()

We can get the value of the solution using the following commands

print("Status: ", prob.status)
print("The optimal value is", prob.value)
print("A solution x is")
print(x.value)

Side Note

I recommend checking (Diamond & Boyd, 2016; Gomory, 1969; Garey & Johnson, 1979; Agrawal et al., 2017) for more details about MIPs and CVXPY

References

  1. Diamond, S., & Boyd, S. P. (2016). CVXPY: A Python-Embedded Modeling Language for Convex Optimization. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 17, 83:1–83:5. http://jmlr.org/papers/v17/15-408.html
  2. Gomory, R. E. (1969). Some polyhedra related to combinatorial problems. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 2(4), 451–558.
  3. Garey, M. R., & Johnson, D. S. (1979). Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H. Freeman.
  4. Agrawal, A., Verschueren, R., Diamond, S., & Boyd, S. P. (2017). A Rewriting System for Convex Optimization Problems. CoRR, abs/1709.04494. http://arxiv.org/abs/1709.04494

Tutorials